TV shows are a mix of talent, timing and chemistry between participants, especially in comedy where debates arise about who drives a show’s success – the host, the supporting cast or the format.
Recently, former cricketer Navjot Singh Sidhu sparked controversy by saying that Kapil Sharma’s rise to fame and the popularity of ‘Laughter Challenge’ was because of him alone, that Kapil had no identity before he joined.
Also Read – After SSR, Kartik Aaryan Target of Bollywood Mafia?
Such statements made by Sidhu as he is set to return to the show after a year’s gap due to legal issues are being seen as dismissive and insulting to Kapil’s contribution.
Sidhu didn’t stop there. He also targeted Archana Puran Singh who has been a judge on the show in his absence and said she was allowed to stay because he didn’t want anyone to lose their job when he returns – implying he was doing her a favour.
Also Read – Kiara’s Pregnancy Costs Big: Kriti Bags Mega Role
This patronising tone has raised eyebrows as it ignores Archana’s own popularity and professionalism.
While Sidhu’s larger than life persona and one liners brought a unique energy to the show, it’s unfair to ignore Kapil’s quick wit, relatable humour and his ability to connect with the audience – qualities that have been the backbone of the show’s success.
Also Read – Good Early Reviews: But Zero Hype Makes BO Doubtful
The success of ‘Laughter Challenge’ was always a team effort and reducing it to one person’s contribution undermines the spirit of ensemble entertainment.
