Trivikram’s Big Names, Worst Roles: A Costly Mistake?

Trivikram's supporting cast draws debate

Trivikram was once known for giving every character in his films a distinct identity. His heroes had memorable dialogues, but the supporting characters were equally entertaining and often left a lasting impression. However, his recent films have raised questions about how much importance he gives to second heroes and second heroines.

From Nuvve Nuvve to Aadarsha Kutumbam AK47, there appears to be a noticeable change in his approach. In films like Nuvve Nuvve and Athadu, even Sunil and so many other actors’ characters were written in a memorable way. They were not just supporting actors filling the screen. Their characters added considerable value to the story. That kind of writing seems to be missing in several of his recent films.

In Ala Vaikunthapurramuloo, many questioned why Sushanth was cast in a role that had very little scope. Now, a similar discussion has emerged around Nara Rohith’s role in Aadarsha Kutumbam. When a known hero is brought on board, audiences naturally expect a character with enough substance. Otherwise, the casting only adds to the budget without offering much to the film.

The situation is similar with second heroines. From Parvati Melton in Jalsa and Meenakshi Chaudhry in Guntur Kaaram to Nivetha Pethuraj in Aadarsha Kutumbam, audiences have questioned the purpose of these roles.

There is also industry talk that the importance explained to actors during narrations does not always translate onto the screen. Some claim that supporting female characters are presented as significant during narrations but eventually receive only limited scenes with no importance.

Trivikram has built his reputation on strong writing and memorable characters. Simply casting familiar faces only increases the budget and leaves both the actors and audiences disappointed. If he wants to bring back the charm of his earlier films, giving every important character a meaningful purpose should be a priority.