
The bench hearing the petition expressed a prima facie view that the FIRs are an attempt to “muzzle media freedom” and Justice DY Chandrachud that it is the time to define the limits of sedition and also opined criticizing a Government does not amount to sedition.
CID has incorporated both the channels in the FIR on the allegation that they alloted “premeditated” and “organized” slots to the MP to intentionally malign the state government. The Supreme Court already granted bail to the Accused No 1, Raghu Rama Krishnam Raju in this case.
The MP has alleged custodial violence by the CID and is demanding a CBI inquiry. The issue is also pending before the Supreme Court.
Vijay has made a strong entry into Tamil Nadu politics with his party Tamilaga Vettri…
For any big-ticket film, nothing shapes audience perception more than the trailer. Teasers create curiosity…