
What kind of s logic is this stating that every poorly rated movie must and should be considered a classic? Why impose a flop movie as a classic as if there is something else beyond the understanding of the common audiences and reviewers?
Once in a while, a film that garnered mixed talk from the critics and reviewers might turn out into a blockbuster in terms of the box-office collections but rarely a classic.
But, whenever their newly released films get poor ratings from the critics, the filmmakers are declaring their movies as classics. Recently, Teja wanted poor ratings for ‘Sita’ saying that his movie would be a blockbuster if given poor ratings. It bit dust.
Director Selvaraghavan and Suriya were of the same opinion that their movie can be decoded only by masterminds and thus, was said to be a disaster. Now, it’s TN Krishna’s turn. What is this logic, boss?
Prabhas turned a casual conversation with Prashanth Neel into a fun moment, and fans got…
Ayushmann Khurrana and Sara Ali Khan’s Udta Teer has arrived in theatres on October 23,…