False Data Exposed as H-1B Debate Catches Fire

The H-1B visa debate is being clouded by misinformation. Much of the confusion comes from misuse of LCA (Labour Condition Application) data, which only represents the first step in the process. LCAs can cover multiple workers, many of whom never receive visas.

LCA misuse spreads false claims

Some reports wrongly use LCA numbers to claim massive filings or low wages for H-1B workers. These inflated figures fuel the idea that foreign professionals are underpaid or replacing American jobs, creating unnecessary outrage.

Real petition data tells a different story

Data reporter Eric Fan analysed actual H-1B petition data obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The findings show that pay varies widely. McKinsey’s median H-1B salary is $195,000, Google’s $140,000, while Cognizant averages $88,000.

Divide between Big Tech and outsourcing firms

The truth is that many H-1B jobs pay competitively, especially in Big Tech. The problem lies mostly with outsourcing companies offering lower salaries. However, public debate often ignores this divide, labelling all H-1B workers as cheap labour.

USCIS data adds to confusion

Even government numbers mislead. The USCIS website mixes new visas with renewals, creating the impression of sudden approval spikes. In reality, denials and approvals have fluctuated across both the Trump and Biden years.

Why it matters for India

For Indian workers, the narrative is damaging. Outsourcing salaries get highlighted while thousands of Indians in high-paying MNC roles are overlooked. This skews public opinion, turning perception into blame and burying the facts behind the H-1B program.