Dhurandhar has drawn attention because some viewers claim that the film carries an anti-Muslim message. But several others argue that these allegations may not reflect the actual intent of the story. A closer reading of the narrative suggests a different interpretation.
The film centres on the masterminds behind major terror attacks such as 26/11, the Parliament attack, and earlier incidents that affected the nation. Its focus is on how terror networks function, how they receive funding, and how cross-border elements plan and execute such operations. Supporters of the film say this framework targets organised terrorism, not any community.
Dhurandhar also explores fake currency networks and the larger aims of agencies like the ISI, presenting them as part of a broader national security conversation. These aspects are shown to highlight threats from organised groups rather than generalise an entire religion. The film avoids excessive jingoism and instead concentrates on the mechanics of terrorism.
Those accusing the film of anti-Muslim sentiment are seen by many viewers as stretching the argument without strong evidence. If someone feels there are inaccuracies, a lawful route such as approaching the courts and presenting proof remains the correct method. Criticism is always welcome, but labelling every discussion on terrorism as Islamophobia may weaken meaningful debate.
India has space for both Right-Wing and Left-Wing perspectives, and both contribute to discourse. However, topics around national security require a view that goes beyond ideological positions. Terrorism is a global concern and not tied to any single religion. Dhurandhar attempts to explore this angle, and judging it only through political or communal filters may overlook its core intention.
