Dhurandhar has been making headlines, especially for Akshaye Khanna’s performance as Rahaman Dakait. The role has earned praise from fans and film lovers alike. Even days after release, discussions around his portrayal continue across social media platforms.
While Akshaye Khanna is being widely applauded, a section of viewers has raised a new angle. They feel the response would have been very different if a mainstream star had played the same role. This debate has now become a talking point online.
Many users argue that Rahaman Dakait is being praised mainly because Akshaye Khanna played him. They believe a popular superstar would have faced heavy criticism instead. Some feel the actor’s image plays a big role in how such roles are judged.
Several fans said backlash would have been severe if one of the Khans had played the part. Online trolling and accusations of being “anti-national” would have followed, they claim. The character being positioned against India would have made reactions even harsher.
Shah Rukh Khan’s role as Raees Alam was also cited in these debates. Though the character was not glorified and died in the end, the outrage was intense. Many say he continues to face criticism even years after the film’s release.
Viewers also pointed to My Name Is Khan as an example. When Shah Rukh Khan played a Muslim character, he was accused of spreading propaganda. Fans feel religious identity shapes public reaction more than performance in many cases.
At the same time, Akshaye Khanna is being praised for playing a dangerous Muslim character in Dhurandhar. This contrast has sparked conversations on bias in audience reactions. Many now see it as proof of uneven standards in Bollywood.
