The signing of Pakistan spinner Abrar Ahmed by Sunrisers Leeds in The Hundred has triggered a major debate in cricket circles. The move has drawn attention because it involves a franchise owned by the Sun Group.
Former India captain Sunil Gavaskar openly criticised the decision. He also questioned the role of Sunrisers Group CEO Kavya Maran in the signing. His remarks quickly became a talking point among cricket fans.
Sunrisers Leeds signed Abrar Ahmed for around Rs 2.34 crore during The Hundred auction in London. The deal attracted widespread discussion across the cricketing community. Many observers noted the unique nature of the signing.
This is reportedly the first time an Indian owned franchise in England has signed a Pakistani cricketer. Because of the long standing political tensions between the two countries, such moves often draw strong reactions.
Sunil Gavaskar explained why he disagrees with the decision. According to him, payments made to Pakistani players eventually become part of the country’s economic system through taxes. He argued that teams should consider the broader implications.
During his comments, Gavaskar used the term blood money while criticising the move. He suggested that Indian owned franchises should carefully think about such decisions. His remarks sparked intense discussion among fans.
The controversy has also highlighted the ongoing debate about politics and sport. Some observers believe cricket decisions should focus only on player ability and performance. Others feel national considerations should also play a role.
The England and Wales Cricket Board has clarified that selections in The Hundred are based purely on cricketing merit. Therefore, there was no regulation preventing the signing of Abrar Ahmed.
Even so, the decision surprised many fans and analysts. Indian owned franchises in leagues such as the IPL, SA20 and ILT20 have generally avoided signing Pakistani players in recent years.
For now, the signing has become one of the biggest talking points surrounding The Hundred this season. The discussion continues among fans, players and experts.
Some supporters believe sport should remain separate from politics. Others agree with Gavaskar’s concerns and argue that national interests must also be considered in such situations.
