The entire Bollywood is supporting Salman Khan and hoping big way that the rod would be spared for the actor who has been doing a lot of charity work in the name of an NGO ‘Being Human’. Since he is popular, B’Town people are asking for fogivance. But if a superstar is bulldozed by a layman who was under the influence of alcohol, would they have asked for the same?
[m9ad]
Bollywood singer Abhijeet expressed his views in such a way that it’s the mistake of the victim to sleep on pavements and not the mistake of Salman Khan to resort to homicide under the influence of alcohol. Pavements are meant for cars and dogs and not for poor people. Does he mean to say, rich people who travel in cars have the right to drive their cars unto the pavements and kill poor shelterless people?
The same question is put by an activist, one Indu Prakash Singh who wants people to boycott Bollywood films for the solidarity the film fraternity is expressing, only because Salman is a star. An advocate Sudhir Kumar Ojha filed a complaint on Abhijeet for the despicable comments he made on the poor of the country. Is the superstar above law?
