Ram Charan’s Peddi has triggered intense discussions ever since its release. While the film is receiving a wide range of reactions from audiences and critics, one particular review by a Telugu journalist has become a talking point on social media for all the wrong reasons.
The reviewer went all out in praising Peddi, calling it an epic blockbuster and even claiming that the film is on its way to collect more than Rs. 1000 crores worldwide. He described the movie as a historic achievement and showered praise on Ram Charan’s performance, saying the actor completely immersed himself in the character and delivered a once-in-a-lifetime role. The reviewer also highlighted the film’s emotional depth, family appeal, and honest storytelling, while appreciating director Buchi Babu Sana’s ambition and vision.
Many movie lovers have no issue with such praise. After all, every viewer is entitled to celebrate a film they genuinely love. If a Telugu film connects deeply with someone, there is nothing wrong with expressing admiration in the strongest possible terms.
However, the controversy began when the reviewer attempted to elevate Peddi by belittling other acclaimed blockbusters, particularly Aamir Khan’s Dangal and Salman Khan’s Sultan.
In his comments, he suggested that films like Dangal lacked the emotional depth and purpose that Peddi supposedly possesses. This comparison immediately drew backlash across social media platforms.
Many users pointed out that Dangal was not merely a commercial blockbuster but a film based on a true story that inspired millions of people. The movie chronicled the journey of wrestler Mahavir Singh Phogat and his daughters, celebrating perseverance, women’s empowerment, and sporting excellence. It remains India’s highest-grossing film worldwide and earned widespread acclaim both domestically and internationally.
Peddi can be celebrated on its own merits without dragging down universally accepted landmark films that have already earned a permanent place in Indian cinema history.
Many fans have also reacted humorously to the review, joking that the journalist’s enthusiasm got the better of him. Memes and comments mocking the excessive praise have been circulating online, with some users saying that the review sounded more like a fan’s emotional reaction, even though he repeatedly referred to it as an “honest review.”
In the end, audiences will decide where Peddi belongs in the larger history of Indian cinema. As one popular social media comment summed it up, praising a film is perfectly fine, but overenthusiasm rarely helps the argument.
