Shah Rukh Khan

Narendra Modi was sworn in as Prime Minister of India for the third consecutive term, with the ceremony held at Rashtrapati Bhavan and attended by dignitaries from India and abroad, including heads of neighboring nations, business leaders, celebrities, and film personalities.

Also Read – Darling – Mad Max Entertainer Premieres Today

A host of stars graced Delhi for Modi’s swearing-in ceremony. Notable attendees included Shah Rukh Khan, Akshay Kumar, Kangana Ranaut, Anupam Kher, Rajinikanth, Vikrant Massey, and filmmaker Rajkumar Hirani.

Certain individuals on social media, primarily from the far-left or extremist factions, are criticizing Shah Rukh Khan for his presence at the event.

Also Read – Kalki Makers Sue Influencers For Fake Collections

They argue that the Modi government has failed to protect the rights of minorities. Additionally, they highlight past incidents where SRK was unfairly targeted by the BJP IT cell, called him Pakistani, and subjected to the spread of false information.

Furthermore, they point to the illegal arrest of SRK’s son, Aryan Khan, despite no evidence. Despite these challenges, Shah Rukh Khan chose to attend Modi’s oath-taking ceremony, leading some to label him as spineless and lacking principles.

Also Read – Why Pushpa 2 Taking Longer Than Baahubali 2?

It’s essential to understand that Shah Rukh Khan has always maintained an apolitical stance. While he has spoken out against hate and bigotry and promoted inclusivity through his films, he does not align himself with any political party. His attendance at the ceremony should not be misconstrued as an endorsement of any political ideology.

Moreover, SRK, being a prominent figure and cultural ambassador for India, cannot afford to disrespect the Prime Minister. Attending such events is part of his diplomatic role. Criticizing him for fulfilling his obligations is unjustified and ignores his significant contributions to Indian culture on the global stage.

In essence, trolling Shah Rukh Khan for attending Modi’s ceremony is baseless and overlooks his larger role as a representative of India’s soft power and cultural heritage.