The Odyssey has received a positive response in India and worldwide. The movie has gained recognition for its visuals and strong storytelling that audiences were missing for a long time.
Meanwhile, a new topic has now emerged after the success of The Odyssey. Notably, a comparison is being made between Christopher Nolan’s big film and Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s upcoming movie, Love and War. This happened after netizens started searching for more details about the making of both films.
People discovered that while filming for The Odyssey was completed in 91 days, a song of Love & War was shot for 92 days. The reason behind the comparison remains unknown. However, the majority of social media users believe that it intends to prove that Indian filmmakers are far better than Hollywood.
While a few stated that SLB was better than Nolan, others stated that Nolan’s filmmaking style is very different, claiming that such comparisons were completely unnecessary. People also wrote that SLB does not compromise on the quality, which is one of the reasons that Love & War has witnessed so many delays.
A few even wrote that Nolan and SLB’s storytelling are different, since the former’s movies do not appeal to all kinds of audience compared to SLB, who makes movies for the masses, despite the fact that they have content that usually attracts the class audience.
On the other hand, a particular section dragged Siddharth Anand into the matter. They addressed the fact that while Nolan has managed to deliver a strong story and outstanding visuals in 91 days, Siddharth has failed to do that every time. Fans of SRK also told Siddharth to learn from Nolan and requested him to deliver something different and new in King.
The Odyssey has undoubtedly started a new debate in filmmaking in India. Let’s wait and see how many are going to follow the same path.
