In recent years, criminal law has increasingly entered the domain of personal relationships. When emotional bonds break down, disputes often reach the courtroom. This trend has raised important questions about consent, autonomy and misuse of legal provisions.
Courts are frequently required to distinguish between genuine criminal conduct and conflicts arising from failed relationships. The law exists to protect individuals from coercion and exploitation. At the same time, it must safeguard personal liberty.
The Karnataka High Court recently voiced concern over the growing invocation of Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The Court observed that cases criminalising consensual sexual relationships after breakups are mushrooming before it. This trend has prompted judicial scrutiny.
Section 69 addresses sexual relations obtained through deceitful means, including false promises of marriage. However, the provision is increasingly being cited after relationships end bitterly. The Court cautioned against automatically converting consensual intimacy into criminal allegations.
The judges emphasised that criminal law cannot become a mechanism to settle emotional grievances. Every failed relationship does not amount to deception. Careful assessment of intent and consent remains essential.
At the same time, the Court made it clear that genuine cases of exploitation must be protected under the law. Proper investigation is crucial to ensure that Section 69 is not diluted or misapplied. Legal safeguards must remain strong for real victims.
The High Court’s remarks underline the need for sensitivity and restraint in applying criminal provisions. Modern relationships are complex and evolving. The justice system must balance protection with respect for individual autonomy.
