The Supreme Court of India said cricket associations should be run by former cricketers and people who understand the game. You were told that those with no cricket background should not control sports bodies.
Supreme Court backs High Court order
A bench led by Surya Kant, along with Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi, refused to interfere with the Bombay High Court order. You see the stay on the Maharashtra Cricket Association elections remain in place.
Court flags sudden rise in members
During the hearing, the court questioned the sharp increase in MCA membership. You learn the association had only 164 members from 1986 to 2023, but the number rose suddenly after that.
Retired players deserve priority
The court said that if associations want to expand, they should give space to retired international cricketers. You were told that former players who served the game deserve a role in running it.
Players, not administrators
The bench clearly stated that sports bodies exist because of players. You see the court stress that cricket is known because of cricketers, not because of administrators.
Case filed by Kedar Jadhav
The matter reached the court after Kedar Jadhav raised concerns over changes in the MCA voter list. You now know the issue began with doubts about fair representation.
Bombay High Court to decide next
The Supreme Court allowed all parties to present their arguments before the Bombay High Court. You were told the case will be heard next and an early decision is expected.
