The Enforcement Directorate’s arrest of Sukriti Foods promoter Kailash Chand Mangla has brought fresh attention to the alleged adulterated ghee supplied to TTD.
According to the ED, ghee allegedly made using refined palm oil, palm kernel oil, palmolein and chemical additives was supplied as genuine cow ghee. The agency claims that ghee worth around ₹230 crore was supplied to TTD between 2019 and 2024, including nearly ₹96 crore allegedly manufactured by Mangla’s facility.
If proven in court, these allegations raise serious questions about procurement, quality checks and supplier verification.
The ED has also alleged that false purchase, sales and transport records were used to support the supplies. If established, such actions could point to organised commercial fraud rather than simple adulteration.
The agency’s claims about intermediaries and alleged bribes linked to the tender process also require detailed investigation and judicial scrutiny.
However, arrest does not establish guilt. Every accused person must be assessed based on evidence and due legal process.
The investigation must also examine TTD’s internal systems. How did the alleged material enter the supply chain? Who approved the consignments? Were testing procedures followed? Did officials ignore warning signs?
The controversy highlights the need for independent laboratory testing, traceable procurement records, surprise inspections and accountability at every stage.
Srivari Laddu holds deep religious importance for millions of devotees. Any alleged compromise in its ingredients affects public trust in TTD’s administration.
The investigation must therefore examine the complete chain of responsibility, from production and documentation to procurement, approval and payment. Only a thorough probe and meaningful reforms can restore confidence and prevent similar controversies.
