Actress Celina Jaitly has filed a domestic violence case against her husband, Austrian businessman Peter Haag. You are now reading details of serious accusations that include emotional, physical, sexual and verbal abuse during their marriage, now formally recorded through a court complaint.
Celina states that her husband forced her into unnatural sexual acts and pressured her to sleep with other men for his personal benefit. She also alleges he took nude photos without consent to blackmail her later and repeatedly insulted her in front of their children.
You learn that Celina has described the marriage as traumatic and abusive. She claims Peter objectified her, threatened her and used degrading language toward her, including calling her a derogatory name before their sons during repeated confrontations at home.
Celina and Peter married in 2010 and had three sons together. One of their twins died due to a heart condition. You now see these personal losses being mentioned in the case to show the emotional toll alongside the legal battle.
In her complaint, Celina says Peter manipulated her financially during moments of emotional weakness. She claims he forced her to transfer property into his name and used control over money as another way to dominate and pressure her during the marriage.
You also read that Celina has demanded Rs 50 crore in damages and monthly maintenance. She has sought custody rights and virtual access to her children, who are currently under Peter’s control according to her legal statements.
The complaint portrays Peter as narcissistic, quick tempered and addicted to alcohol. You now see how these behaviours are listed as part of the pattern that created a toxic household environment where she says she lived in fear and distress.
The court has scheduled the next hearing for December 2025. You will see more details emerge through official proceedings as the judge reviews evidence, testimonies and documentation related to the accusations raised by Celina against her husband.
This case draws attention to domestic abuse within marriage. You are reminded that such violations often stay hidden behind closed doors until victims speak out through the legal system and demand accountability for emotional and physical harm.
Celina’s decision to go public under legal protection reflects her attempt to reclaim control and voice. You now witness how court intervention becomes the last step when private suffering turns into public injustice.
