The discussion around players skipping red-ball cricket has returned. Former India captain and ex-chairman of selectors Dilip Vengsarkar has questioned Shreyas Iyer’s decision to take a six-month break from first-class cricket while still playing in white-ball formats. His remarks reflect how players now view the longer format differently.
Iyer cites fitness concerns to BCCI
Shreyas Iyer informed the BCCI that he was struggling with recurring back spasms and stiffness while playing red-ball cricket. He said he needed time to regain endurance and focus on his fitness before returning to longer matches.
ODI vice-captaincy sparks debate
Soon after his announcement, Iyer was named India’s ODI vice-captain under Shubman Gill, replacing Rohit Sharma. The timing of the decision has raised eyebrows. Many are asking how a player can be unfit for red-ball cricket but fit enough for white-ball games.
Vengsarkar questions fitness logic
In a chat with Mid-Day, Vengsarkar said, “It’s a dilemma for me because he [Iyer] says he is unfit for red-ball cricket but fit for white-ball cricket. I don’t understand the difference between the two. If you are fit for white-ball cricket, you are fit for red-ball cricket too.” His comment captures the confusion over players choosing formats that suit their comfort more than team needs.
Changing player mindset
Vengsarkar’s concern goes beyond Iyer. Even Virat Kohli, once the face of Test cricket, has stepped back despite being fully fit. The trend shows a clear shift in priorities. Today’s players often prefer shorter, less demanding, and financially rewarding formats over traditional Test matches.
The fading love for Test cricket
The issue raises a tough question how many current players truly want to play red-ball cricket? For legends like Vengsarkar, Test cricket is the ultimate test of skill and character. It teaches patience, discipline, and toughness. As India begins a new Test cycle, fans and selectors alike wonder who among the younger generation is ready to take on that challenge.
